Xthemsqt was rhapsodic.
“This is such a beautiful world,” he/she opined. “Look at the way the light of our distant sun reflects off the equatorial permafrost. Why, our best astronomers have proven that, were our planet but a few million qzeks closer to the sun, the precious ice covering would melt, and we would cook in the heat. And, were we somewhat further away, the ammonia oceans would freeze and we would no longer be able to harvest the precious fzurk-mk.
“It seems to me that only an intelligent Creator could have fashioned such a world. Why, isn’t it too extraordinary to be coincidental that we, who could not survive without methane, just happen to live on a planet whose glacial atmosphere is more than 30% methane gas? And don’t you think it astonishing,” he/she continued, waving a lazy flipper-analogue in the general direction of his/her own opalescent and mucoidal torso-segments, “that we should be provided with such an abundance of tasty exoskin parasites on which to feed?” He/she plucked a quivering lbcksaat-grub from beneath a fleshy fold, and quickly absorbed its electrical charge. “These delicious morsels were clearly designed for our nourishment, don’t you think?”
Flemsqat sensed the mass of his/her elder relative through his/her sensory nodes. Turning his/her third snout in Xthemsqt’s direction, he/she looked pensive.
“Most excellent Xthemsqt,” Flemsqat began. “I fear there is a flaw in your reasoning. Although you are correct, in that we are clearly situated on a world ideal for our needs, I believe you are mistaken when you assume that it was designed for our benefit. Is it not possible that perhaps it is we, in existence for such a short part of this planet’s history, who have adapted to our surroundings?”
A low and disapproving farting sound erupted from Xthemsqt, but Flemsqat continued unabated. “Imagine, if you will, a world very much unlike our own. Suppose that it were much hotter, so hot that hydrogen dioxide melted, and suppose the atmosphere was rich in corrosive oxygen. Imagine a world without dfgrith, where the gravity was ten times our own. Now consider creatures that might evolve on such a world. Carbon-based, say. Bilaterally symmetrical. Creatures that are so alien, so otherworldly, that they experience the universe in a profoundly different way – by detecting electromagnetic wavelengths, for example. Creatures that have to break down organic matter to obtain nourishment.”
Xthemsqt indicated, with a casual twist of a tentacle, that he/she followed.
“Now consider,” continued Flemsqat, “what such beings might think. They would say, ‘Look at how warm our world is, and how well suited for our particular form of life!’ But you and I would know, most excellent Xthemsqt, that such a world was no Paradise, but the worst sort of Hell – why, we would not survive for mere kpliks in a place like that!”
“What is your point, esteemed Flemsqat?” drawled Xthemsqt, languorously wallowing in a pool of his own spthrge. He/she was confused by the course this conversation was taking, and emitted a brief burst of bewildered high-intensity radiation.
“Simply this, O most excellent kinsman, simply this. What if we have not so much been placed in a world designed for our comfort, but rather have evolved to exist comfortably in such a world? Had the setup been different, had the planet been warmer, or larger, or in a different star system, it is true that we would not have arisen as a species – but perhaps something else would! Can you imagine how foolish it would be if the carbon-based creatures we considered a moment ago were to deduce, from the eminent suitability of their planet, the existence of some Divine Creator? Well might you undulate your gibbl in mirth at the idea!”
Xthemsqt looked discomfited. He/she was not used to having his/her ideas questioned, especially by a young upstart like Flemsqat, who was barely out of gbothlk. There did not seem, however, to be a suitable reply. Xthemsqt let out a flatulent sigh and allowed his/her gibbl to droop slightly in defeat. Then, being the elder of the two (and constrained by the dictates of propriety), he/she proceeded to kill and dissect Flemsqat, for the execrable crime of heresy.
The moral? Nobody likes a smartass, even if he’s right.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 25, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Sarge
Wonderful parable! Didn’t even take interpretation or pondering its true meaning.
January 25, 2009 at 4:42 pm
PhillyChief
I welcome our tentacled, farting overlords.
January 26, 2009 at 12:23 am
Sarge
The farting part is pretty much what you get on THIS planet in the same situation.
January 26, 2009 at 4:47 am
Brian Larnder
mmmm… exoskin parasites.
January 26, 2009 at 5:24 pm
andyinthepiewithalmonds
Ah Yunshui – I do appreciate your genius. Just a shame you have chosen to employ it for the purpose of attempting to tear me from this perfectly good faith of mine!
For what it’s worth, I have never been particularly struck by the anthropic principle at the level of species within planetary conditions. Far more convincing to me is the principle when applied to universal origin. You are only too aware, I’m sure, of the almost proposterous unlikelihood of the Big Bang having birthed a stable and life-sustaining (any life!) universe – the room for manoeuvre is down to one part in a million on a whole range of factors.
I guess atheism sees our Big Bang as only one of an untold number of attempts across the hypothetical infinity of space and time? If so it’s possible I guess; albeit about as provable as an unseen creator God! But I do nonetheless enjoy Tim Keller’s analogy of a poker player who, having drawn his 24th consecutive hand of straight aces, calmly points out to those levelling pistols at him that “in an infinite number of poker games, this was bound to happen eventually…”
January 26, 2009 at 5:41 pm
PhillyChief
I don’t care for making shit up to explain what’s either unexplainable or difficult to accept.
Your comparison of our existence through natural means being as provable as your fantasy of a god is an amusing attempt to portray each as equally credible.
January 26, 2009 at 5:52 pm
yunshui
Hi andy, good to have you back.
I’m not sure why you find the anthropic principle applicable on a planetary but not a universal scale. It’s the exact same thing – we find a universe/planet suitable for life because we exist to observe it. Yes the chances of the Big Bang spawing a stable universe are likely very improbable, but it obviously did spawn a stable universe, because – here we are! Whether this is one of an infinite number of “failed” universes, or part of an ongoing multiverse, is a moot point; as the old WWI song goes: “We’re ‘ere because we’re ‘ere because we’re ‘ere, because we’re ‘ere…”
Thank you for the compliment – I assure you that I use my planet-sized intellect for more than just Christian-bashing. Only the other day I invented a shopping bag filled with helium, to make carring the weekly groceries easier… the only drawback is that you have to hold it upside down, so the helium doesn’t escape.
January 26, 2009 at 11:41 pm
Eshu
Thanks I really enjoyed this!
I thought it was quite authentic too – everyone knows all aliens have X’s and Q’s in their names. And usually a minor facial abnormality whilst still being basically humanoid.