Oliver Sacks is the poster-boy for neurology in much the same way as Richard Dawkins is the public face of evolutionary biology. In his most famous book, The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat, Sacks presents a variety of neurological case studies from the more extreme end of the spectrum. Thus we are introduced to Christina, who has no sense of her body at all; to Mr Thompson, who reinvents his world every few seconds; to poor Jimmie, stuck forever in 1945; and of course, to Dr P., who is indeed unable to distinguish between his spouse and his headgear.
In very few cases does Professor Sacks actually delve into the physiological reasons for his patients’ maladies (the section entitled “Transports”, concerning hallucinatory seizures, is a notable exception) instead confining himself to an explanation of their symptoms and a description of their treatment. The book is therefore steered away from becoming a technical treatise on brain dysfunction (which it could well have turned into) and focuses rather more on the human impact of such conditions. Sacks finds humanity in the most apparently hopeless of cases, and in doing so raises our awareness of what it means to be human.
He offers an interesting exposition of the visions of St Hildegard, whose religious raptures he convincingly ascribes to migraine scotomas, but still takes the view that religion is psychologically useful to many sufferers (an idea I think I’ll devote an entire post to very soon). Sacks also investigates the phenomenon of “human calculators”, ascribing the abilities of his patients to a synesthetic numerical ability, rather than actual mathematical skill.
Offering no real conclusions, but a range of ideas for further consideration, The Man Who Mistook… makes for a readable and rather uplifting introduction to neurology, even if it does raise more questions than it answers.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 15, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Evo
If you find this field fascinating, then you should put V.S. Ramachandran on you list. If you want to see how interesting his work is, watch this.
August 15, 2008 at 8:02 pm
yunshui
I read Phantoms In The Brain some years back, but I don’t think I was really ready for it. Might have to pick that one up again (once I’ve finished recommendations from Ex, Eshu, TheNerd, you, a couple of other people… PLEASE STOP TELLING ME ABOUT BOOKS!)
(just kidding, of course – there’s a reason for the Amazon Wishlist…)
August 15, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Evo
Notice I didn’t even MENTION “Phantoms”? (You should re-read it)!
I’m just giving you videos from now on. Did you watch your first assignment? Because I don’t see a video report anywhere. At least do a poem. Don’t forget to roll your “R”s.
August 16, 2008 at 1:02 am
Brad
Because of Ebon Musings’ “A Ghost in the Machine” essay, I am interested in reading Phantoms in the Brain as well. If you want a sneak peak as well as a relation of other bizarre neuroscience to theism, then I’d recommend that essay. (Although it’s huge!)
August 17, 2008 at 12:25 am
psychodiva
I loved The Man who Mistook….. I read it when I was first training in psychology and it really helped me to get into abnormal psych :)
August 17, 2008 at 10:06 am
yunshui
Evo:
People witnessing God, Allah and Ra,
Who have been neurologically scanned are
Inclined to have strained
Vital bits of their brains
So sayeth V.S. Ramachandra
Apologies for poor scansion, I’m a bit under the weather at the moment.
Brad: Are you looking forward to the book? Apparently he’s pretty much finished compiling it. That’s going straight to the top of my “must read” list.
Psychodiva: Wifeshui (who’s doing her doctorate in psychology at the moment) recommended this one to me – it seemed a tad more readable than her other textbooks…
August 18, 2008 at 3:52 am
Evo
You have Wifeshui
Lifeguard has Wifeguard
Should mine be Evolutionary Midwife?